Scientific observation differs from other methods of data collection specifically in four ways:
CHARACTERISTICS
OF OBSERVATION
Scientific observation differs
from other methods of data collection specifically in four ways: (i)
observation is always direct while other methods could be direct or indirect;
(ii) field observation takes place in a natural setting; (iii) observation
tends to be less structured; and (iv) it makes only the qualitative (and not
the quantitative) study which aims at discovering subjects’ experiences and how
subjects make sense of them (phenomenology) or how subjects understand their
life (interpretivism).
Lofland (1955) has said that this
method is more appropriate for studying lifestyles or sub-cultures, practices,
episodes, encounters, relationships, groups, organizations, settlements and
roles etc. Black and Champion (1976) have given the following characteristics
of observation:
1. Behavior is observed in natural surroundings.
2. It enables understanding
significant events affecting social relations of the participants.
3. It determines reality from the perspective of
observed person himself.4. It identifies regularities and
recurrences in social life by comparing data in our study with that of other
studies. Besides, four other characteristics are: 1. Observation involves some control
pertaining to the observation and to the means he uses to record data. However,
such controls do not exist for the setting or the subject population.2. It is focused on hypotheses-free inquiry.3. It avoids manipulations in the
independent variable i.e., one that is supposed to cause other variable(s) and
is not caused by them.4. Recording is not selective.Since at times, observation technique is indistinguishable from
experiment technique, it is necessary to distinguish the two.
Tags : Research Methodology - Observation
Last 30 days 6068 views