Most people agree that holding two stocks is less risky than holding one stock. For example, holding stocks from textile, banking, and electronic companies is better than investing all the money on the textile company’s stock. But building up the optimal portfolio is very difficult. Markowitz provides an answer to it with the help of risk and return relationship.
The Markowitz Model
Most people agree that holding two stocks is less risky than holding one stock. For example, holding stocks from textile, banking, and electronic companies is better than investing all the money on the textile company’s stock. But building up the optimal portfolio is very difficult. Markowitz provides an answer to it with the help of risk and return relationship.
Assumptions
The individual investor estimates risk on the basis of variability of returns i.e. the variance of returns. Investor’s decision is solely based on the expected return and variance of returns only.
For a given level of risk, investor prefers higher return to lower
return. Likewise, for a given level of return investor prefers lower risk than
higher risk.
The Concept
In developing his model, Markowitz had given up the single stock
portfolio and introduced diversification. The single security portfolio would
be preference if the investor is perfectly certain that his expectation of
highest return would turn out to be real. In the world of uncertainty, most of
the risk averse investors would like to join Markowitz rather than keeping a
single stock, because diversification reduces the risk. This can be shown with
the help of the following illustration.
Take the stock of ABC company and XYZ company. The returns expected
from each company and their probabilities of occurrence, expected returns and
the variances are given. The calculation procedure is given in the table.
ABC Companies stocks have the same expected return of 9%.
XYZ company’s stock is much riskier than ABC stock, because the standard
deviation of the former being 6 and latter 3. When ABC return is high XYZ
return is low and vice-versa i.e. when there is 17% return from ABC, there
would be 8% return from XYZ. Likewise when ABC return is 11% XYZ return is 20%.
If a particular investor holds only ABC or XYZ he would stand to lose in the
time of bad performance.
Suppose the investor holds two thirds of ABC and one third of XYZ,
the return can be calculated as follows
Let us calculate the expected return for the both the
possibilities.
In both the situations, the investor stands to gain if the worst
occurs, than by holding either of the security individually.
Holding two securities may reduce the portfolio risk too. The
portfolio risk can be calculated with the help of the following formula.
Using the same example given in the return analysis, the portfolio
risk can be estimated. Let us assume ABC as X1 and XYZ
as X2. Now the covariance is: X 12
The correlation co-efficient indicates the similarity or dissimilarity in the behavior of X1 and X2 stocks. In correlation, co-variance is not taken as an absolute value but relative to the standard deviation of individual securities. It shows, how much X and Y vary together as a proportion of their combined individual variations measured by σ1 and σ2. In our example, the correlation co-efficient is -1.0 which indicates that there is a perfect negative correlation exists between the securities and they tend to move in the same direction. If the correlation is 1, perfect positive correlation exists between the securities and they tend to in the same direction. If the correlation co-efficient is zero, the securities’ returns are independent. Thus, the correlation between two securities depends upon the covariance between the two securities and the standard deviation of each security.
Now, let us proceed to calculate the portfolio risk. Combination of
two securities reduces the risk factor if less degree of positive correlation
exists between them. In our case, the correlation coefficient is -1.
The portfolio risk is nil if the securities are related negatively.
This indicates that the risk can be eliminated if the securities are perfectly
negatively correlated. The standard deviation of the portfolio is sensitive to
(1) the proportions of funds devoted to each stock (2) the standard deviation
of each security and (3) co-variance between two stocks.
The change in portfolio proportions can change the portfolio risk.
Taking the same example of ABC and XYZ stock, the portfolio standard deviation
is calculated for different proportions.
By skillful balancing of the investment proportions in different securities, the portfolio risk can be brought down to zero. The proportion to be invested in each security can be found out by X1 = σ2 ÷ (σ1 + σ2) the precondition is that the correlation co-efficient should be -1.0. Otherwise it is
If the correlation co-efficient is less than the ratio of smaller
standard deviation to larger standard deviation, then the combination of two
securities provides a lesser standard deviation of return than when either of
the security is taken alone. In our example,
-1 < 3/6 i.e. -1 < + .50
If the standard deviation ratio is 4/6 and the correlation
co-efficient is + .8, the combination of securities is not profitable because
+ 8 > 4/6 i.e. + 8 > .66
Varying Degrees of
Correlation
Here in order to learn more about the relationship between
securities, different degrees of correlation co-efficients are analyzed.
Extreme cases like +1, 1, intermediate values and no correlation are calculated
for two securities namely X and Y. We assume that the investor has specific
amount of money to invest and that can be allocated in any proportion between
the securities. Security X has an expected rate of return of 5% and a standard
deviation of 4%. While for security Y, the expected return is 8% and the
standard deviation of return is 10%.
Let us first work out the expected return and the portfolio risk
for different values of correlation coefficients for varying proportions of the
securities X and Y. Portfolio return is calculated with the equation:
Rp = XxRx + XyRy
If there is 75% investment on X and 25% on Y, then Rp = .75(5%) + 0.25 (8%) = 5.75% then the σp would be found out by using equation
Table gives the values of Rp and σp for varying degrees of correlation co-efficients.