The process of combining securities in a portfolio is known as diversification. The aim of diversification is to reduce total risk without sacrificing portfolio return. In the example considered above, diversification has helped to reduce risk. The portfolio standard deviation of 17.09 is lower than the standard deviation of either of the two securities taken separately, which were 50 and 30 respectively.
Reduction of Portfolio Risk Through
Diversification
The process of combining securities in a portfolio is known as
diversification. The aim of diversification is to reduce total risk without sacrificing
portfolio return. In the example considered above, diversification has helped
to reduce risk. The portfolio standard deviation of 17.09 is lower than the
standard deviation of either of the two securities taken separately, which were
50 and 30 respectively.
To understand the mechanism and power of diversification, it is
necessary to consider the impact of covariance or correlation on portfolio risk
more closely. We shall examine three cases: (a) when security returns are
perfectly positively correlated, (b) when security returns are perfectly
negatively correlated, and (c) when security returns are not correlated.
Security Returns Perfectly
Positively Correlated
When security returns are perfectly positively correlated the
correlation coefficient between the two securities will be +1. The returns of
the two securities then move up or down together.
The portfolio variance is calculated using the formula:
σ2p = x12σ12 + x22σ22 + 2x1x2(r12σ1σ2)
Since r12 = 1, this may be rewritten
as:
σ2p = x12σ12 + x22σ22 + 2x1x2σ1σ2
The right hand side of the equation has the same form as the
expansion of the identity (a + b)2, namely a2 + 2ab + b2. Hence,
it may be reduced as
σ2p = (x1σ1+ x2σ2 )2
The standard 1deviation then becomes
σp = x1σ1+ x2σ2
This is simply the weighted average of the standard deviations of
the individual securities.
Taking the same example that we considered earlier for calculating
portfolio variance, we shall calculate the portfolio standard deviation when
correlation coefficient is +1.
Portfolio standard deviation may be calculated as:
Being the weighted average of the standard deviations of individual
securities, the portfolio standard deviation will lie between the standard
deviations of the two individual securities. In our example, it will vary
between 50 and 30 as the proportion of investment in each security changes.
For example, if the proportion of investment in P and Q are 0.75
and 0.25 respectively, portfolio standard deviation becomes:
σp = (0.75) (50) + (0.25) (30)
= 45
Thus, when the security returns are perfectly positively
correlated, diversification provides only risk averaging and no risk reduction
because the portfolio risk cannot be reduced below the individual security
risk. Hence, diversification is not a productive activity when security returns
are perfectly positively correlated.
Security Returns Perfectly
Negatively Correlated
When security returns are perfectly negatively correlated, the
correlation coefficient between them becomes -1. The two returns always move in
exactly opposite directions.
The portfolio variance may be calculated as:
σ2p = x12σ12 + x22σ22 + 2x1x2(r12σ1σ2)
Since r12 = -1, this may be rewritten
as:
σ2p = x12σ12 + x22σ22 − 2x1x2(σ1σ2)
The right hand side of the equation has the same form as the
expansion of the identity (a - b)2, namely a2 - 2ab + b2. Hence,
it may be reduced as:
σ2p = (x1σ1 - x2σ2 )2
The standard deviation then becomes:
σp = x1σ1 - x2σ2
For the illustrative portfolio considered above, we can calculate
the portfolio standard deviation when the correlation coefficient is —1.
σp = (0.4)(50) - (0.6)(30) = 2
The portfolio risk is very low. It may even be reduced to zero. For
example, if the proportion of investment in P and Q are 0.375 and 0.625
respectively, portfolio standard deviation becomes:
σp = (0.375)(50) - (0.625)(30) = 0
Here, although the portfolio contains two risky assets, the
portfolio has no risk at all. Thus, the portfolio may become entirely risk free
when security returns are perfectly negatively correlated. Hence,
diversification becomes a highly productive activity when securities are
perfectly negatively correlated, because portfolio risk can be considerably
reduced and sometimes even eliminated. But, in reality, it is rare to find
securities that are perfectly negatively correlated.
Security Returns Uncorrelated
When the returns of two securities are entirely uncorrelated, the
correlation coefficient would be zero.
The formula for portfolio variance is:
σ2p = x12σ12 + x22σ22 + 2x1x2(r12σ1σ2)
Since r12 = 0, the last term in the
equation becomes zero; the formula may be rewritten
σ2p = x12s12 + x22σ22
The standard deviation then becomes:
σp = √x1σ1 + x2σ2
For the illustrative portfolio considered above the standard
deviation can be calculated when the correction coefficient is zero.
The portfolio standard deviation is less than the standard
deviations of individual securities in the portfolio. Thus, when security
returns are uncorrelated, diversification reduces risk and is a productive
activity.
We may now tabulate the portfolio standard deviations of our
illustrative portfolio having two securities P and Q, for different values of
correlation coefficients between them. The proportion of investments in P and Q
are 0.4 and 0.6 respectively. The individual standard deviations of P and Q are
50 and 30 respectively.
Portfolio
Standard Deviations
From the above analysis we may conclude that diversification
reduces risk in all cases except when the security returns are perfectly
positively correlated. As correlation coefficient declines from +1 to -1, the
portfolio standard deviation also declines. But the risk reduction is greater
when the security returns are negatively correlated.