The most important distinction between the Eurodollar banking market and domestic banking is that Eurocurrency markets are not subject to domestic banking regulations. Eurobanks may obtain same profit levels as domestic banks even though they achieve lower spreads on lending depositors’ funds than their domestic counterparts. The absence of reserve requirements and regulations enables Eurobanks to offer slightly better terms to both borrowers and lenders. Eurodollar deposit rates are higher, and effective lending rates a little lower, than they are in domestic money markets. The absence of regulations is the key to the success of the Eurocurrency markets.
The most
important distinction between the Eurodollar banking market and domestic banking is that Eurocurrency markets are not subject to domestic banking
regulations. Eurobanks may obtain same profit levels as domestic
banks even though they achieve lower spreads on lending depositors’ funds than
their domestic counterparts. The absence of reserve
requirements and regulations enables Eurobanks to offer slightly better terms
to both borrowers and lenders. Eurodollar deposit rates are higher, and effective lending
rates a little lower, than they are in domestic money
markets. The absence of regulations is the key to the success of the Eurocurrency markets.
Deep Euromarkets
exist only in those currencies, such as the US dollar, the German mark and the pound sterling,
that are relatively freely convertible into other currencies.
A Eurodollar deposit may be created
and lent on in the manner set out below.
A US corporation with $2 million surplus funds decides to take advantage
of the more attractive Eurodollar rates
on deposits relative
to domestic dollars.
The company’s surplus
funds were held
originally in a time deposit with a demand deposit in the local US bank. The company transfers
ownership, by payment,
of the demand deposit in the local US bank to the US bank in London, where a time
deposit is made. This process creates a Eurodollar deposit, substituting for an equivalent domestic time deposit
in a US bank. The London branch of
the US bank deposits the cheque in its account in a US bank. The US company holds a dollar deposit in a bank in London rather than in the USA. The
total deposits of the banks in the USA remains unchanged. However, investors hold smaller deposits
in the USA and larger deposits
in London. The London Bank now has a larger
deposit in the U.S.A. The increase in the London bank’s deposits
in the US bank is matched by the increase in
dollar deposits for
the world as a whole. The volume of dollar deposits in the USA remains unchanged, while the volume
in London increases.
The London bank
will not leave the newly acquired $2 million idle. If the bank does not have a commercial borrower
or government to which it can lend the funds,
it will place the $2 million in the Eurodollar
interbank market. In the words, it will deposit the funds in some other
Euro bank.
If this second
Euro bank cannot immediately use the funds to make a loan, it will redeposit them again in the inter-bank market. This process of re
depositing might proceed through several Euro banks before the $2
million finds its way to a final borrower. At each stage the next bank will pay a slightly higher rate than the
previous bank paid. But the margins
involved in the inter-bank market are very small - of the order of 1/8 per
cent. As a rule, larger,
better-known banks will receive initial
deposits while smaller
banks will have to bid for deposits in the inter-bank market.
This inter-bank
re-depositing of an original Eurodollar deposit merely involves the passing on of funds from bank to bank. It does not, of course, add to the final extension of credit in the financial
markets. Only when the $2 million is lent on to a corporation or a
government is credit eventually and effectively extended. To evaluate the true
credit- creation capacity of the Eurodollar market,
inter-bank deposits have to be netted out. The
ultimate stage in the credit-creating process occurs when a Euro bank
lends funds to a non- bank borrower.
Loans made in
the Euro market are similar to those made domestically by UK and US banks and so on. More lending is done on a corporate reputation or name
basis, as it is sometimes called, to
well-known entities, with less credit investigation and documentation being involved than in domestic lending. When the amount needed is greater
than one Euro bank is prepared to provide, borrowers obtain funds by tapping a syndicate of banks from different countries. Borrowers often have the option of borrowing in
any of several currencies. Eurocurrency loans may be for short-term working capital or trade finance,
or they may have maturities up to ten years. The latter would be called
medium-term Eurocredits, although
they are basically no different from their short-term counterparts. When a Eurocurrency loan has a maturity of
more than six months, the interest rate is usually
set on a roll-over basis – that is, at the start of each three – or six – month period, it is reset at a fixed amount (e.g. 1 per
cent) above the prevailing London inter-bank offered rate.
Eurocurrency
deposits often carry interest rates of ½ per cent higher than domestic deposits and borrowers can obtain cheaper
money in Euromarkets as opposed to domestic ones.
So why do not all depositors and borrowers shift their business into the
Eurocurrency market. One reason is the existence of exchange
controls. Many governments make it difficult
for depositors to invest abroad, and many restrict foreign borrowing by
domestic companies. Another
reason is the inconvenience and cost involved
with maintaining balances or borrowing in a foreign
country. Furthermore, the market is largely a wholesale one, and deals in sums of under $1 million
are not available. Euro banks also prefer to lend to large, well-known corporations, banks or governments. But the most important
difference is that Euro deposits, because
they are located
in a different country, are in some respects subject to the jurisdiction of the country.