The volume of new equity issues in the international markets increased dramatically between 1983 and 1987 and again after 1989. The ‘90s saw a growing interest in the emerging markets.
The Depository Receipts Mechanism
The volume of
new equity issues in the international markets increased dramatically between 1983 and 1987 and again after 1989. The ‘90s saw a growing
interest in the emerging markets.
From the side of the issuers, the driving force was the desire to tap low-cost sources of financing, broaden the
shareholder base, acquire a spring board for
international activities such as acquisitions and generally improve
access to long-term funding. From the
point of view of investors, the primary motive has been diversification. Some of these markets may not be readily accessible except to very high quality
issuers.
When the issue size is large the issuer may consider
a simultaneous offering
in two or more markets. Such
issues are known
as Euroequities.
Issue costs are
an important consideration. In addition to the underwriting fees (which may be in the 3 – 5% range), there are substantial costs involved in preparing for an equity issue particularly for
developing country issuers unknown to developed country investors. Generally speaking,
issue costs tend to be lower in large domestic
markets such as the US and Japan.
Depository Receipts
(ADRs, EDRs, and GDRs)
During the late
‘80s, a number of European and Japanese companies have got themselves listed on foreign stock
exchanges such as New York and London. Shares of many firms are traded indirectly in the form of depository
receipts. In this mechanism, the shares
issued by a firm are held by a depository, usually a large international bank,
which receives dividends, reports
etc. and issues claims against these shares. These claims are called “depository receipts” with
each receipt being a claim on a specified number of shares. The depository receipts are denominated in
a convertible currency, usually US dollars. The depository receipts may be listed and traded on major stock
exchanges or may trade in the OTC market. The issuer firm pays
dividends in its home currency. This is converted into dollars by
the depository and distributed to the holders of depository receipts. This way
the issuing firm avoids listing fees and onerous
disclosure and reporting requirements which would
be obligatory if it were to be directly listed on the stock exchange. This
mechanism originated in the US, the
so-called American Depository Receipts or ADRs. Recent years have seen the emergence of European
Depository Receipts (EDRs) and Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) which can be used to tap multiple markets with a
single instrument. Transactions in depository receipts are
settled by means of computerized book transfers in international clearing systems such as Euroclear and Cedel.
In 1992 following the experience of the first
ever GDR issue
by an Indian corporate, a fairly large number of Indian companies
took advantage of the improved
market outlook to raise equity capital in international markets. During the period April
1992 to 1994, almost 30 companies are
estimated to have raised a total of nearly US$3 billion through GDR issues.
From the point
of view of the issuer, GDRs represent non-voting stock with a distinct identity which do not exhibit
in its books. There is no exchange
risk since dividends are paid by the issuer in its home currency. The device allows
the issuer to broaden its capital base
by tapping large foreign equity markets. The risk is that the price of GDRs may
drop sharply after issue due to problems in the local
markets and damage the issuer’s reputation which may harm future issues.
From the investors’ point of view, they achieve
portfolio diversification while acquiring
an instrument which is denominated in a convertible currency and is traded on developed stock markets.
The investors bear exchange risk and all the other risks borne by an equity holder. There are also taxes
such as withholding taxes on dividends and taxes on capital
gains.
A major problem and concern with international equity issues is that of flowback, i.e. the investors
will sell the shares back in the home stock market of issuing firm. Authorities of some countries have imposed a minimum
lock-in period during which foreign investors
cannot unload the shares in the domestic
market.
Withholding taxes on dividends paid to non-residents reduces the attractiveness of the asset to foreign shareholders and consequently raises
the cost to the issuer.
During 1993-94,
GDR issues were a very popular device for many large Indian companies. Yields in developing country
markets were rather low and many Indian issues
offered attractive returns along with diversification benefits. The
economic liberalization policy of the
government made Indian issues an attractive investment vehicle for foreign investors. In subsequent years, a variety of problems with the workings of
the Indian capital markets – lack of adequate custodial and
depository services, long settlement periods,
delivery and payment delays, suspicions of price rigging etc. – led to
the wearing off of investor enthusiasm.
The world market capitalization of bonds is
larger than that of equity. The international market for bonds comprises three major
categories: domestic bonds, foreign bonds and Eurobonds.
Domestic bonds are issued
by a domestic borrower in the domestic
market, usually in domestic
currency.
Foreign bonds
are issued on the domestic market by a foreign borrower, usually in domestic currency. The rules and regulations governing issuing and trading
procedures are under the control
of the domestic authorities.
Eurobonds are
issued in countries other than the one in whose currency they are denominated. They are not traded
on a particular national bond market and, therefore, are not regulated by any domestic
authority.
Financing and
investing in the international bond markets is both technical and difficult. This stems from the vast
diversity in regulation, instruments, terminology and techniques.
The Major Domestic Bond Markets
The
globalization of the world’s capital markets has introduced an element of competition among the different markets
and has enabled borrowers to diversify their
financing sources. The World Bank’s “global bonds” issued simultaneously
in September 1989 on the Eurobond
market and the US domestic
market are a good example.
Investors also
benefit from globalization. The different domestic bond market can offer attractive diversification opportunities. They are also a source of
products with unique characteristics
arising from the different legal, fiscal and economic systems of the countries where they are issued.
For a firm raising funds in the
international capital markets or for an investor managing an international bond
portfolio, thorough technical knowledge of each domestic market is a fundamental
requirement. This is an especially difficult proposition because there is a wide variety of instruments
available. They range from classic fixed interest bonds, through FRNs,
zero coupons, convertibles and bonds with warrants attached to the more
exotic varieties with simultaneous call and put options or links to an index
such as a stock market or gold. Trading
and quotation practices
concerning the various
instruments can vary from market to market. In Europe, dealing
and quotations are usually handled
by brokers on the exchanges, although Germany. The Netherlands,
Switzerland and the United Kingdom do
some over-the-counter trading of non-government issues. In the United States most trading in domestic
bonds is handled over the counter, while in Japan bond trading
takes place over the counter
and on the exchanges. When trading is handled over
the counter, it is difficult to estimate costs which are hidden in the bid-ask
spread. Even when commissions are charged by brokers on the organized
exchanges, the fact that they are negotiable makes it hard to come up with an average
figure.
Price and yield
quotations also differ from market and it is important to know and understand these differences when
comparing the relative merits of different domestics bonds.
Asian Currency
Market
Asian dollars
are the same current account surpluses in dollars used in the Asian continent. Singapore has developed as the centre for this market,
particularly after 1968. This market facilities the use of dollar balances
in the Asian continent for balance of payments
purposes as well as for investment
in development projects.
It has imparted greater liquidity
to the Asian economies whereby larger trade and larger investment became
possible in this region. There was also greater
co-operation in economic and financial matters as a result of the Asian dollar market in many centres
in the region such as Hongkong, Sydney and Manila.
Source and Uses
The main sources
of funds for the market came from varied groups individuals, corporations, commercial banks, international institutions, multinationals, the central banks, the governments etc. Thus, a part
of the dollar deposits is owned by the US banks and US nationals. Originally, the market had grown without any
official favour and as an off-shoot
of pure private enterprise. Subsequently, when it reached a state of
significant dimensions which no single nation could control, all governments and international institutions began to consider
it respectable and partake in its operations. Borrowers and lenders
in the market are only banks insofar as the inter-bank segment is concerned. Among the non-bank public, companies in
export and import business or in investment business
or multinationals in need of funds and governments or central banks for balance
of payments purposes
figure prominently in the non-bank markets. Among borrowings, bulk of it is for commercial operations
by non-bank public and business corporations.
The
Euro-currency market has no geographical limits or a common market place. Business is done by telex, telephone and
other communication systems. Internationally-
reputed brokers put through the transactions for the banks. Deposits are
secured for the banks operating in
the market by the general guarantee of its parent or holding company and in some cases, by its central bank and
/or the government of the concerned country.
Similarly, loans to commercial parties are guaranteed by their
respective governments. Deposits and
loans to banks are, however, not guaranteed except by the banks parent companies or their exchange
control authorities.
The amounts of
loans and the periods of maturity vary over a wide range from a few thousands to millions of dollars and from call loans to maturities
extending up to 10-15 years. Some of
the loans may be syndicated and jointly sponsored by a number of banks. There are also varied
interest rates of floating rate notes.