A group may be defined as two or more people who interact to accomplish some goals. Within the broad scope of this definition are both an intimate “group” of two neighbors who informally attend a fashion show together and a larger, more formal group, such as a neighborhood.
Introduction
With the exception of those very few people who can be classified
as hermits, people tend to be involved with others on a rather constant basis.
Like almost all behavior, an individual’s social relationships are often
motivated by the expectation that they will help in the satisfaction of
specific needs. For example, a person might become a volunteer ambulance driver
to satisfy a need for community recognition. Another person might join a
computer club in an effort to find compatible friends to satisfy social needs.
A third person might join a health food cooperative to obtain the benefits of
group buying power. These are just a few of the almost infinite number of
reasons why people involve themselves with others.
What Is A Group?
A group may be defined as two or more people who interact to
accomplish some goals. Within the broad scope of this definition are both an
intimate “group” of two neighbors who informally attend a fashion show together
and a larger, more formal group, such as a neighborhood.
Types of Groups
To simplify our discussion, we will consider four different types
of group classification: primary versus secondary groups, formal versus
informal groups, large versus small groups, and membership versus symbolic
groups.
Primary versus Secondary
Groups
If a person interacts on a regular basis with other individuals
(with members of his or her family, with neighbors, or with co-workers whose
opinions are valued), then these individuals can be considered as a primary
group for that person. On the other hand, if a person interacts only
occasionally with such others, or does not consider their opinions to be
important, then these others constitute a secondary group for that person.
From this definition, it can be seen that the critical distinctions
between primary and secondary groups are the frequency with which the
individual interacts with them and. the importance of the groups to the
individual.
Formal versus Informal Groups
Another useful way to classify groups is by the extent of their
formality; that is, the extent to which the group structure, the members’
roles, and the group’s purpose are clearly defined. If a group has a highly
defined structure (e.g., a formal membership list), specific roles and
authority levels (a president, treasurer, and secretary), and specific goals
(to support a political candidate, improve their children’s education, increase
the knowledge or skills of members), then it would be classified as a formal
group.
The local chapter of the American Red Cross, with elected officers
and members who meet regularly to discuss topics of civic interest, would be
classified as a formal group.
On the other hand, if a group is more loosely defined, if it
consists, say, of four women who were in the same college sorority and who meet
for dinner once a month, or three co-workers who, with their spouses, see each
other frequently then it is considered an informal group.
Large versus Small Groups
It is often desirable to distinguish between groups in terms of
their size or complexity. A large group might be thought of as one in which a
single member is not likely to know more than a few of the group’s members
personally, or be fully aware of the specific roles or activities of more than
a limited number of other group members. Examples of large groups include such
complex organizations as General Motors, with its numerous subordinate
divisions, and the American Bar Association, with its many state, county, and
city chapters.
In contrast, members of a small group are likely to know every
member personally and to be aware of every member’s specific role or activities
in the group. For example, each staff member of a college newspaper is likely
to know all the other members and be aware of their duties and interests within
the group.
In the realm of consumer behavior, we are principally concerned
with the study of small groups, since such groups are more likely to influence
the consumption behavior of group members.
Membership versus Symbolic
Groups
Another useful way to classify groups is by membership versus
symbolic groups. A membership group is a group to which a person either belongs
or would qualify for membership. For example, the group of women with whom a
young homemaker plays golf weekly or with whom she hopes to play golf when an
opening occurs would be considered, for her, a membership group.
In contrast, a group in which an individual is not likely to
receive membership, despite acting like a member by adopting the group’s
values, attitudes, and behavior, is considered a symbolic group. Clearly,
actual membership groups offer a more direct, and thus a more compelling,
influence on consumer behavior.
In summary, we can say that small, informal, primary membership
groups are of the great interest to marketers because they exert the greatest
potential influence on consumer purchase decisions.
Consumer-Relevant Groups
To more fully comprehend the kind of impact that specific groups
have on individuals, we will examine six basic consumer-relevant groups: the
Family, Friendship groups, Formal social groups, Shopping groups, Consumer
action groups and Work groups.
The Family
An individual’s family is the most important group to influence his
or her consumer decisions. The family’s importance in this regard is due to the
frequency of contact that the individual has with other family members and that
the family has a greater extent of influence on the establishment of a wide
range of values, attitudes, and behavior.
Friendship Groups
Friendship groups are informal groups because they are, usually
unstructured and lack specific authority levels. In terms of relative
influence, after an individual’s family, it is friends who are most likely to
influence the individual’s purchase decisions.
Seeking and maintaining friendships is a basic drive of most
people. Friends fulfill a wide range of needs: they provide companionship,
security, and opportunities to discuss problems that an individual may be
reluctant to discuss with members of his or her own family. Friendships are
also a sign of maturity and independence, for they represent a breaking away
from the family and the forming of social ties with the outside world.
Consumers are more likely to seek information from those friends they feel have
values or outlooks similar to their own.
Formal Social Groups
In contrast to the relative intimacy of friendship groups, formal
social groups are more remote and serve a different function for the
individual. A person joins a formal social group to fulfill such specific goals
as making new friends, meeting “important” people (e.g., for career
advancement), or promoting a specific cause. Because members of a formal social
group often consume certain products together, such groups are of interest to
marketers. For example, the membership list of a men’s club would be of
interest to local men, Insurance agents, automobile agents, tax accountants.
Membership in a formal social group may influence a consumer’s
behavior in several ways. For example, members of such groups have frequent
opportunity to informally discuss products, services, or stores. Some members
may copy the, consumption behavior of other members whom they admire.
Shopping Groups
Two or more people who shop together-whether for food, for
clothing, or simply to pass the time, can be called a shopping group. Such
groups are often offshoots of family or friendship groups. People like to shop
with others who they feel have more experience with or knowledge about a
desired product or service. Shopping with others also provides an element of
social fun to an often boring but necessary task. In addition, it reduces the risk
that a purchase decision will be socially unacceptable.
Relatively few marketing or consumer behavior studies have examined
the nature of shopping groups. However, one study of the in-store behavior of
shoppers revealed some differences between group and individual shopping. The
research found that shopping parties of at least three persons deviated more
from their original purchase plans (they bought either more or less than
originally planned) than did either single shoppers or two-party groups. The study
also found that shopping groups tended to cover more territory in the store
than individuals shopping alone, and thus had more opportunity to see and
examine merchandise and to make unplanned purchases.
A special type of shopping group is the in-home shopping group,
which typically consists of a group of women who gather together in the home of
a friend, to attend a “party” devoted to the marketing of a specific line of
products. The in-home party approach provides marketers with an opportunity to
demonstrate the features of their products simultaneously to a group of
potential customers. The undecided guests often overcome a reluctance to buy
when they see their friends make positive purchase decisions. Furthermore, some
of the guests may feel obliged to buy because they are guests in the home of
the sponsoring hostess.
Consumer Action Groups
A particular kind of consumer group-a consumer action group- has
emerged in response to the consumerist movement. This type of consumer group
has become increasingly visible since the 1960s and has been able to influence
product design and marketing practices of both manufacturers and retailers.
Consumer action groups can be divided into two broad categories:
those that organize to correct a specific consumer abuse and then disband, and
those that organize to address broader, more pervasive, problem areas and
operate over an extended or indefinite period of time. A group of tenants who
band together to dramatize their dissatisfaction with the quality of service
provided by their landlord, or a group of irate community members who unite to
block the entrance of a fast-food outlet into their middle-class neighborhood,
are examples of temporary, cause-specific consumer action groups.
Work Groups
The sheer amount of time that people spend at their jobs,
frequently more than thirty-five hours per week, provides ample opportunity for
work groups to serve as a major influence on the consumption behavior of
members.
Both the formal work group and the informal friendship/work group
have the potential for influencing consumer behavior. The formal work group
consists of those individuals who work together as a team. Their direct and
sustained work relationship offers substantial opportunity for one or more
members to influence the consumer-related attitudes and activities of other
team members. Members of informal work groups may influence the consumption
behavior of other members during coffee or lunch breaks or after-hours
meetings.
Social Class
Social class is more of a continuum, i.e., a range of social
positions, on which each member of society can be place. But, social
researchers have divided this continuum into a small number of specific
classes. Thus, we go by this framework, social class is used to assign
individuals or families to a social-class category.
Social class can be defined as ‘The division of members of a
society into a hierarchy of distinct status classes, so that members of each
class have relatively the same status and the members of all other classes have
either more or less status.’
Characteristics of Social Classes
The main characteristics of social class
Persons within a given social class tend to behave more alike
Social class is hierarchical
Social class is not measured by a single variable but is measured
as a weighted function of one’s occupation, income, wealth, education, status,
prestige, etc.
Social class is continuous rather than concrete, with individuals
able to move into a higher social class or drop into a lower class.
Factors responsible for Social Stratification
Factors showing social class differences
Impact of social class
Provides a sense of identity
Imposes a set of ‘normative’ behavior
Classes share values, possessions, customs and activities
Marketing response to customers of different economic means
Marketing to the low-income consumer
Some marketers ambivalent as not perceived as long-term customers
constitutes a substantial group
Target with value-oriented strategies
Reference Groups
Reference groups are groups that serve as a frame of reference for
individuals in their purchase decisions. This basic concept provides a valuable
perspective for understanding the impact of other people on an individual’s
consumption beliefs, attitudes, and behavior. It also provides some insight
into methods that groups can be used to effect desired changes in consumer
behavior.
What is a Reference Group?
A reference group is any person or group that serves as a point of
comparison (or reference) for an individual in the formation of either general
or specific values, attitudes, or behavior. The usefulness of this concept is
enhanced by the fact that it places no restrictions on group size or
membership, nor does it require that consumers identify with a tangible group (i.e.,
the group can be symbolic: prosperous business people, rock stars, and sports
heroes).
Reference groups that influence general values or behavior are
called normative reference groups. An example of a child’s normative
reference group is the immediate family, which is likely to play an
important role in molding the child’s general consumer values and behavior
(e.g., which foods to select for good nutrition, appropriate ways to dress for
specific occasions, how and where to shop, what constitutes “good” value).
Reference groups that serve as benchmarks for specific or narrowly
defined attitudes or behavior are called comparative reference groups. A comparative reference group might be
a neighboring family whose lifestyle appears to be admirable and worthy of
imitation (the way they maintain their home, their choice of home furnishings
and cars, the number and types of vacations they take).
Both normative and comparative reference groups are important.
Normative reference groups influence the development of a basic code of
behavior; comparative reference groups influence the expression of specific
consumer attitudes and behavior. It is likely that the specific influences of
comparative reference groups are to some measure dependent upon the basic
values and behavior patterns established early in a person’s development by
normative reference groups.
Broadening the Reference
Group Concept
Like many other concepts borrowed from the behavioral sciences, the
meaning of reference group has changed over the years. As originally employed,
reference groups were narrowly defined to include only those groups with which
a person interacted on a direct basis (e.g., family and close friends).
However, the concept has gradually broadened to include either direct and indirect
individual or group influences. Indirect reference groups consist of those
individuals or groups with whom a person does not have direct face-to-face
contact, such as movie stars, sports heroes, political leaders, or TV
personalities. Referents that a person might use in evaluating his or her own
general or specific attitudes or behavior vary from an individual to several
family members to a broader kinship, from a voluntary association to a social
class, a profession, an ethnic group, a community, or even a nation.
Types of Reference Groups
Reference groups can be classified in terms of a person’s
membership or degree of involvement with the group and in terms of the positive
or negative influences they have on his or her values, attitudes, and behavior.
Four types of reference groups that emerge from a cross-classification of these
factors:
A contractual group is a group in which a person holds membership or has regular face-to-face contact
and of whose values, attitudes, and standards he or she approves. Thus a
contactual group has a positive influence on an individual’s attitudes or
behavior.
An aspirational group is
a group in which a person does not hold membership and does not have
face-to-face contact, but wants to be a member. Thus it serves as a positive
influence on that person’s attitudes or behavior.
A disclaimant group is a
group in which a person holds membership or has face-to-face contact but
disapproves of the group’s values, attitudes, and behavior. Thus the person
tends to adopt attitudes and behavior that are in opposition to the norms of
the group.
An avoidance group is a
group in which a person does not hold membership and does not have face-to-face
contact and disapproves of the group’s values, attitudes, and behavior. Thus
the person tends to adopt attitudes and behavior that are in opposition to
those of the group.
Consider Ron a senior majoring in advertising at the state
university in the southwestern United States. The school’s Advertising Club, of
which he is vice-president, serves as one of Ron’s contractual groups. Ron
believes that continuing his education to obtain an MBA will enhance his career
opportunities. It is clear that individuals who hold the MBA degree serve as an
aspirational group for him. Still further, although he enjoys his position as a
reporter on the university’s newspaper, the recent editorials (endorsed by most
of the staff) urging students to adopt a more conservative political philosophy
run counter to his own views. Thus the newspaper staff is currently a disclaimant
group. Finally, Ron personally knows a number of students who have quit college
during their final year; these former students serve as an avoidance group.
Factors that Affect Reference Groups Influence
The degree of influence that a reference group exerts on an
individual’s behavior usually depends on the nature of the individual and the
product and on specific social factors. This section discusses how and why some
of these factors operate to influence consumer behavior.
Information and Experience
An individual who has firsthand experience with a product or
service, or can easily obtain full information about it, is less likely to be
influenced by the advice or example of others. On the other hand, a person who
has little or no firsthand experience with a product or service, and does not
expect to have access to objective information about it (e.g., a person who
believes that relevant, advertising may be misleading or deceptive), is more
likely to seek out the advice or example of others. Research on imitative
behavior provides some interesting insights on how insufficient experience or
information concerning a product makes consumers more susceptible to the
influence either positive or negative, of others. For example, if a medical
school student wants to impress his new girl-friend, he may take her to a
restaurant that he knows from experience to be good or to one that has been
highly recommended by the local newspaper’s Dining-Out Guide. If he has neither
personal experience nor information he regards as valid, he may seek the advice
of friends or imitate the behavior of others by taking her to a restaurant he
knows is frequented by physicians whom he admires.
Credibility, Attractiveness,
and Power of the Reference Group A reference group, which is perceived as credible, attractive, or
powerful can induce consumer attitude and behavior change. For example, when
consumers are concerned with obtaining accurate information about the
performance or quality of a product or service, they are likely to be persuaded
by those they consider to be trustworthy and knowledgeable. That is, they are
more likely to be persuaded by sources with high credibility. When consumers
are primarily concerned with the acceptance or approval of others they like,
with whom they identify, or who offer them status or other benefits, they are
likely to adopt their product, brand, or other behavioral characteristics.
When consumers are primarily concerned with the power that a person
or group can exert over them, they might choose products or services that
confirm to the norms of that person or group in order to avoid ridicule or
punishment. However, unlike other reference groups that consumers follow either
because they are credible or because they are attractive, power groups are not
likely to cause attitude change. Individuals may conform to the behavior of a
powerful person or group but are not likely to experience a change in their own
attitudes.
Different reference groups may influence the beliefs, attitudes,
and behavior of an individual at different points in time or under different
circum- stances. For example, the dress habits of a young female attorney may
vary, depending on her place and role. She may conform to the dress code of her
office by wearing conservative business suits by day and drastically alter her
mode of dress after work by wearing more conspicuous, flamboyant styles.
Conspicuousness of the
Product
The potential influence of a reference group varies according to
how visually or verbally conspicuous a product is to others. A visually
conspicuous product is one that can be seen and identified by others, and that
will stand out and be noticed (e.g., a luxury item or novelty product). Even if
a product is not visually conspicuous, it may be verbally conspicuous it may be
highly interesting or it may be easily described to others. Products that are
especially conspicuous and status-revealing (a new automobile, fashion
clothing, home furniture) are most likely to be purchased with an eye to the
reactions of relevant others. Products that are less conspicuous (canned
fruits, laundry soaps) are less likely to be purchased with a reference group
in mind.
The success of a brand of status running shoes like Reebok is aided
by the fact that it is relatively easy to spot a person wearing them-given the
distinctive flag symbol on the side of each shoe.
Reference Group Impact on
Product and Brand Choice
In some cases, and for some products, reference groups may
influence both a person’s product category and brand (or type) choices. Such
products are called pro- duct-plus, brand-plus items. In other cases, reference
groups influence only the product category decision. Such products are called
product-plus, brand-minus items. In still other cases, reference groups
influence the brand (or type) decision. These products are called
product-minus, brand-Plus items. Finally, in some cases, reference groups
influence neither the product category nor the brand decision; these products
are called product-minus, brand-minus items. The idea of classifying products
and brands into four groups in terms of the suitability of a reference group
appeal was first suggested in the mid-1950s, along with an initial
classification of a small number of product categories.
Reference Groups and Consumer
Conformity
Marketers are particularly interested in the ability of reference
groups to change consumer attitudes and behavior (i.e., to encourage
conformity). To be capable of such influence, a reference group must:
Inform or make the individual aware of a specific product or brand;
Provide the individual with the opportunity to compare his or her
own thinking with the attitudes and behavior of the group;
Influence the individual to adopt attitudes and behavior that are
consistent with the norms of the group;
Legitimize an individual’s decision to use the same products as the
group.
The ability of reference groups to influence consumer conformity is
demonstrated by the results of a classic experiment designed to compare the
effects.
Benefits of the Reference Group Appeal
Reference group appeals have two principal benefits for the
advertiser: they increase brand awareness and they serve to reduce perceived
risk.
Increased Brand Awareness
Reference group appeals provide the advertiser with the opportunity
to gain and retain the attention of prospective consumers with greater ease and
effectiveness than is possible with many other types of promotional campaigns.
This is particularly true of the celebrity form of reference group appeal,
where the personality employed is generally well known to the relevant target
segment.
Celebrities tend to draw attention to the product through their own
popularity.
This gives the advertiser a competitive advantage in gaining
audience attention, particularly on television where there are so many brief
and similar commercial announcements.
Reduced Perceived Risk
The use of one or more reference group appeals may also serve to
lower the consumer’s perceived risk in purchasing a specific product. The
example set by the endorser or testimonial-giver may demonstrate to the
consumer that uncertainty about the product purchase is unwarranted: Following
are examples of how reference group appeals serve to lower the consumer’s
perceived risk.
Celebrity: Consumers who admire a particular celebrity often have
the following reactions to the celebrity’s endorsement or testimonial. For e.g.
“She wouldn’t do a commercial for that product if she didn’t believe it was
really good.”
Expert. When consumers are
concerned about the technical aspects of a product, they welcome the comments
of an acknowledged or apparent expert. For e.g. “If he says it works, then it
really must work.”
Common Man. When consumers are worried about how a product will
affect them personally, they are likely to be influenced by a common man
endorsement or testimonial. For eg. “People just like me are using that
product,”