Borrowers, be it an individual or a corporate entity are rated for their creditworthiness. And why not, the banks themselves are now entering the capital market to raise funds. It has become all the more important in the context of the new code of greater transparency and prudential norms. While ratings act as a guide to the average investor, it also enhances the credibility of the rated organizations.
The
Rating Challenge
Borrowers, be it an
individual or a corporate entity are rated for their creditworthiness. And why
not, the banks themselves are now entering the capital market to raise funds.
It has become all the more important in the context of the new code of greater
transparency and prudential norms. While ratings act as a guide to the average
investor, it also enhances the credibility of the rated organizations.
Presently, credit rating is
mandatory in India for debt instruments with conversion/redemption exceeding 18
months for fixed deposit programmes of all non- banking finance companies. It
is optional for PSU bonds and privately placed non convertible debentures.
Are the Indian rating
agencies able to meet evaluation standards and eliminate influence of vested
interests? For this, it is imperative that they are independent. In the Indian
case, the existing three rating agencies, viz CRISIL, ICRA, and CARE are
promoted by financial institutions. They may well serve as in-house rating
agents to assess credit risk of their customers. But what would be the
yardsticks and whether they would remain impartial when their promoters
themselves would be the clients? We may think of other independent rating
agencies in the field but there is every likelihood that industrial groups may
start their own rating agencies, on the patterns of their own financial
agencies. In such an eventuality, there is every danger of such agencies
becoming an in-house sort of entity thereby compromising on objectivity in
rating standards.
Multiple agencies may
increase competition in rating but ir may also land up in indifferent rating
standards and there is also the risk of succumbing to pressures for attracting
business. There have been criticisms of Indian credit rating agencies. First,
that they assign ratings which are not comparable against international
standards, Secondly the rating symbols they assign are internally inconsistent,
and thirdly agencies are not kept at arm’s length from their sponsors.
Conclusion
The primary benefit of credit
rating has been to enable the investor to identify the risks associated with
various debt obligations. The other benefits include decreasing the potential
conflict between the underwriters and the investors, providing greater
liquidity in secondary markets, encouraging increased disclosure on the part of
the companies, better accounting standards and improved financial information
for the promotion of individual and institutional investor protection.
With the eruption of new
financial instruments and the realization on the part of the investor of the
invaluable service that credit rating agencies provide, credit rating is bound
to find its niche in the investment decision making process and act as a
positive step in the direction of increasing investor protection. Thus credit
rating has firmly docked itself on the shores of the Indian capital market. The
Credit rating agencies have ample opportunities to play a unique role in
strengthening the capital market and building investor’s confidence in the
Indian Financial System.